Rt. Hon. Paul Martin
Prime Minister of Canada
The Office of the Prime Minister
House of Commons
Ottawa , ON . K1A 0A6
(613)-992-4211

TITLE: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF CANADA VIOLATED PARLIAMENT ARY MANDATES AND WAS AN ACCOMPLICE IN VIOLATION OF THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN ORDER TO PROMOTE CORRUPTION

THE ISSUES ARE: the research is more important than corrupt politicians and business peoples' arrogance and meanness. To make clear what EXACTLY

Are the Prime Minister's DUTIES and OBLIGATIONS for ensuring that the MANDATE of the Ministry of Health is fulfilled guaranteeing TRUTHFULNESS and INTEGRITY of the research as paid for by the taxpayers under any and all federal programs. And the Government's TRUE commitment to protecting Charter Rights and a

JUST SOCIETY.

***Courier Delivered***
***Public Domain/Internet***
***Copies to Opposition Parties***

Dear Rt. Hon. Prime Minister, Paul Martin:

Churchill declared that it is not good enough to say we are doing the best we can, but rather, we must do that which is necessary to get the job done. Addressing you is necessary so the research may be continued and justice is served. The letter is necessary for a basis for the public to understand the importance of violating a citizen's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and violating an Act of Parliament; the Mandate of the ministry of Health governing taxpayer funded research in Canada ; and these actions are not without consequence to the public good. The corruption benefited only a few corrupt business people and politicians while suppressing research of benefit to society in general. And a good leader should care and be upset by such corruption, but your government may have been part of the problem, NOT the solution. You can only prove that statement unfair by solving the problem by seeing justice served with my Charter Rights upheld: anything less is failure.

THEME: How any society (Canada shelters a Nazi SS Death Squad member with special Parliamentary committees headed by Liberal MP Andrew Telegdi) deals with yesterdays heinous crimes indicates how corrupt the government is and what they will make acceptable (i.e., stem cell lines from forced abortions in China) The Paul Martin Government CHOSE to continue to support past governments' violations of (human rights) the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in order to conceal fraud and scientific misconduct. The Federal Government has CHOSEN the “MACLEOD SELFISHNESS” over the “BANTING PHILOSOPHY” of science for the GOOD OF ALL OF MANKIND. By so doing, the Federal Government HAS INSTITUTIONALIZED the Thalidomide/Tainted Blood Models as federal standards in order to protect cronyism and private gain. POINT: NO ONE on Paul Martin's Stem Cell Research Guideline Group had the ability to comprehend the research fraud of the South Korean researcher who falsified his research: their only apparent interest /ability was to hand out taxpayers monies for private gain (prove otherwise). The Federal Government's actions in the Center of Excellence program serves ONLY to PRIVATIZE ALL science and health care in Canada for private gain to the public's detriment.

Prime Minister, evidence from the Gomery Inquiry PROVES that the immediately previous (Chretien) government engaged in cronyism and corrupt practices to benefit private interests/agendas, and so it is alleged that they acted to obstruct justice in order to protect the University of Waterloo . Precedent: the liberal government of Canada tried to intervene in the civil legal action against RIM/University of Waterloo in the United States courts.

Evidence from the Tainted Blood scandal proves corrupt actions of governmental agencies associated with the Ministry of Health results in harm to the public. Proven fact from the (mis) handling of the Westray Mine Disaster Inquiry is that the federal government uses delaying tactics to ride out criminal cases so to shield friends. Will this also be the case with Finance Minister Goodale and the Income Trust Scandal Investigation of the RCMP? It is alleged, in the case of the Nazi SS death Squad member who LIED to enter Canada , that money and business connections take precedent over ethics and crimes against humanity (irregardless how you voted on the Armenian Genocide). In short, Prime Minister, it is irrelevant what public speeches you may make on VALUES and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the only true test is what you ACTUALLY DO to ensure that they have REAL meaning and are enforced. And in this case, enforcing the Charter will mean exposing fraud and corruption by having a Public Inquiry with subsequent civil actions in federal court. NO EXCUSES are acceptable as the principles involved are so serious as to question what you really stand for and what are your true values.

Prime Minister, the serious issues NECESSITATE a Formal UNAMBIGUOUS clear answer regarding the RESPONSIBILITY/ACCOUNTABILITY of the federal Government of Canada's MANDATE under the Ministry of Health Act requiring TRUTHFUL AND HONEST SIGNED ASSURANCES are made by signators of universities, i.e., CEOs, Presidents and Chancellors for federal programs. What standards and how that taxpayers' monies will be spent on scientific research under this Mandate? Please answer this specific question; does the federal government accept lying by CEOs, specifically Douglas Wright of the University of Waterloo ? Is lying for money Fraud? If you can't answer these questions, what good are you and your government to Canada ?

And is your commitment to research as good as your commitment to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? I highlight your public words (12 December 05) “that you can't CHERRY PICK in the Constitution to over ride the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.” And I am forced to point out to you that it is easy to talk empty talk and do nothing, since you made the speech when a synagogue was defaced. Is it not true that not very many stood up to Hitler, but private businesses and scientists developed private gain as the Constitution was violated and those who did speak up were black listed or worst? Sir, your Liberal MP Andrew Telegdi has defended the rights of a former SS Death Squad member and chaired Commons Committees trying to help this man, and all the while I have been black listed with my Charter Rights violated for speaking up against fraud and unethical activities. And, my then MP Telegdi did not form even ONE committee or raise the issue in the Commons. Very telling!

Let me make this perfectly clear on how important such a committee would have been to Canada and saving lives and taxpayers' monies: South Korean Hwang Woo-suk/stem cell researcher LIED!!! (just like researchers at the University of Waterloo did). Yet governments all over the world were (are) setting aside billions of tax dollars to replicate his work. You set up a Stem Cell Committee to establish ETHICAL guidelines. Had MP Telegdi (and you) really been committed to human rights, ethics and the Charter, the Commons Committee to investigate the unethical/fraud activities at the University of Waterloo would have proven to have been a very valuable asset to the people of Canada. But, NO, the federal government has acted to cover up misconduct by the University of Waterloo and Ministry of Health (re., Min. Anne McClellan and Allan Rock's ministry). What are you going to do, Prime minister? Call a public inquiry? The issues are important to the public good; or they should be more so than protecting an SS Death Squad member!

I mention the Public Inquiry and draw your attention to emails sent to your office dating back to 2003. The nazi analogy is a good one because they claimed they were innocent because they were UNAWARE of the death camps etc. Why were you unaware? In the last election, liberals were running around with e-mails concerning homophobic topics alleged to your opponents. Why were you able to receive these and not mine? Are you prepared to CHERRY PICK on issues concerning the Charter? You are made aware definitely now, sir, and that is why you are receiving this formal courier letter marked Public Domain.

Rather than continue on about stem cell ethics, forced abortions in China and billions of dollars wasted on fraudulent wasteful research, lets simplify the problem. A conspiracy to cover up means someone(s) have buried the issue from plain view and requires the public's help to expose (unless you do your duty and call a public inquiry), and may even necessitate a civil action (based upon the Charter) causing the RCMP Commissioner, Zarcardelli to be put under oath to be required to answer simple questions for the public record (thus proving possible/more likely than not RCMP misconduct and involvement in a political inspired conspiracy to obstruct justice and cover up).

The simple and important questions are:

•  Is research described in derogatory terms in OFFICIAL Ministry of Health documents, excellent? Yes or no?

The OBVIOUS, TRUTHFUL, answer is NO; however, it is necessary for the Commissioner of the RCMP to be on public record under oath. Then he will be asked'

2.Is lying for federal money, which would not be granted if the whole truth were told, fraud? Yes or no?

The obvious, truthful answer is yes and will be on public record.

The above is important because it will establish more likely than not that the RCMP could be compromised by business and political interests to cover up fraud and Charter violations. Are our politicians/business people corrupt enough to do this? The answer is found in the Gomery Inquiry and former PM Chretien's plain brown envelopes filled with thousands of dollars. The answer is proven to be yes.

And would the Canadian federal government even consider interfering with legal proceedings? The Paul Martin federal government has a direct connection (as did Chretien's) to the University of Waterloo and has tried to intervene on the behalf of RIM. You tried to dissuade the American government from allowing the NTP civil case to proceed in US courts. Courts, over which you have no jurisdiction, and no direct influence over, not like the RCMP. The precedent is proven. The Paul Martin government will lend interference for a billion dollar company like RIM/University of Waterloo , but do nothing for an individuals Charter of Rights and Freedoms and suppressed cancer research. Indeed, more likely than not, your government may be a very big part of the problem.

Bad research affects more than careers or even universities reputations, it impacts lives, and society's ethics and morality. It can waste billions of dollars going down wrong paths, while blocking good research so people who otherwise could have been helped, died needlessly. If you are not a member of the wrongdoing, then what are you going to do, sir? I have requested a public inquiry, but if you have a better solution, I am open to positive, honest suggestions that will get the research going again. I will await your answer briefly, but I suspect I will have to ask the opposition leaders the same questions, and post this material on the website, www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com with additional material and then launch a massive e-mail campaign asking the entire world for help. Do you have a positive answer?

Thank you.

Edward A. Greenhalgh

Please remember to answer the specifically requested questions, Mandate etc.

Title: DO YOU TRUTHFULLY FULLY SUPPORT THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS: IN LETTER AND SPIRIT?

10 January 2006

A General Letter to the Leaders of the Opposition Parties

Mr.Stephen Harper Leader of the Conservative Party

Mr.Gilles Duceppe Leader of the Bloc Quebecois

Mr. Jack Layton Leader of the New Democratic Party

Mr. Jim Harris Leader of the Green Party

*** Public Domain/Internet***

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) is meant to ACTUALLY work for individual Canadians, not to be an abstract, unapplied exercise. If it is real, then it must be enforced, even to the Supreme Court of Canada. No excuses, or it is a fraud. Each of you has received a brief cover letter so the following will reference that and the material (copy) sent to P.M.Paul Martin. Fascist and Communist (and criminal) governments do not respect individuals and misuse the law and throw the might of the government against individuals. Canada should be better, and to this end the Charter of Rights and Freedoms exists to protect individuals, so making Canada a better nation. Individuals make a difference, and perhaps the most important Canadian example is, Dr. Banting, the discoverer of insulin. Dr.Banting had an individual idea that no one ever had before, and although school children can now explain the concept, back then it was original, and vitally important. Dr. Banting did not consider himself superior to all other doctors, nor to everyone at the University of Toronto , but he believed that he had an important insight that would help people. And he did. And had Dr. MacLeod, head of medicine at U.of T. not copied Banting's notes so badly so to be forced to ask Banting to repeat them, we would never have heard of Dr. Banting today: institutionalized corruption would have succeed. However, corruption was not to succeed, and Banting made the world a better place, and turned down millions of dollars so more people would benefit from the discovery: an example forgotten by many today. See, individuals who do not claim to be better than everyone else but who want to make a better world can make a difference, but CORRUPTION must always be overcome.

The University of Waterloo, in particular, Douglas Wright, then CEO and President, is such a corrupt institution causing the suppression of research (for personal gain), but beyond unethical MacLeod's, they have actually violated a Mandate of Parliament, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: outlined in the P.M.Paul Martin material.

However, that is not the issue being asked of you. The issue that I wish to establish before the public is your own honesty, integrity and commitment to the Constitution/Charter and the health and safety of all Canadians. How is anyone harmed by the violation of the Mandate of the ministry of Health, with science suppressed? Ans. Thalidomide. Tainted Blood. Mad cow. Past History? Ok, how about the south Korean researcher who lied about stem cells, and you had NO qualified Canadian scientists able to speak or competent enough to recognize scientific fraud (or cared enough)! No one died. But money and precious time could have been wasted which is the same thing as people dieing down the road. The government has responsibilities, not excuses to the taxpayer. SARS and bird flues are new dangers. The University of Waterloo did not simply block cancer research when they violated my rights to cover up fraud, but suppressed new ideas (Cell Death gene/Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of life; VTT) like Banting's insulin, and one of the questions that this research raises concerns flu and evolution and genetic engineering. And people may die because research is suppressed so fraud may be covered up. Cover up to protect corruption at the Ministry of Health. Are you going to be part of the corruption?

Only accountability saves lives. And as a group, each one of you knows about this case on the public domain: denial is not an option unless you are corrupt and enjoy lying. The issues are important to society and the future. Are you up to it? Do you support the Charter of Rights and Freedoms fully? You see, gentlemen, this letter and the one to PM Martin are dated and sent too late to influence the present election. If such were the intent they would have had to have been sent well before Christmas. No, they are sent now in order to emphasize your own honesty and commitment for the public record when you all are making speeches about corrupt government etc. The harm I have experienced with the suppression of research has been the direct consequence of a corrupt government violating federal acts, the law and the Charter. So are you prepared to fight corruption? Are you committed to the public good? To the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? All the way to the Supreme Court?

That, gentlemen, is why I have approached each of you this way.

Thank you.

Mr. Gilles Duceppe
Leader of the Bloc Quebecois
Office # 533 House of Commons
Parliament Bldg
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A6
613-992-6779

Dear Mr. Gilles Duceppe:

I wish to thank you for your reply of several years ago, but you will see the matter never resolved itself. You are receiving a general letter to all the leaders of the opposition, and material sent to P.M.Paul Martin. The one question of concern to the people of Quebec, why was it acceptable to suppress cancer research to cover up federal fraud, unless people in Quebec do not care or do not get cancer. The issues are important to everyone.

Thank you,

Edward A.Greenhalgh

Dear Mr. Stephen Harper:

You are receiving this material in your capacity as the Leader of the Conservative Party because it impacts how individual Canadians are treated when wealthy and politically connected people believe that they are above (and can manipulate) the law, Acts of Parliament, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. What may be the most telling is how the might of the wealthiest people in Canada was used against an individual from the working class. Is this the kind of Canada that you will accept or do you demand better? The issues, especially the suppressed cancer/flu research should be of major importance.

Thank you,

Edward A. Greenhalgh

Dear Mr. Jim Harris:

You are sent this material in your capacity as the leader of a federal party. You will find the general letter sent to all four leaders plus the material sent to P.M.Paul Martin. The issues are important to the Canadian democracy and the public health and safety. Any help you can provide would be most appreciated.

Thank you,

Edward A.Greenhalgh

Mr. Jack Layton
Leader of the New Democratic Party
Central Block
House of Commons
Parliament Bldg
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A6
613-947-0867

Dear Mr. Jack Layton:

You have been sent this letter and the enclosed material, general letter to opposition leaders, and the P.M.Paul Martin letter, because the issues are important to the social fabric of the Canadian democracy, and the public health and safety. What kind of Canada do you really want, and what are you willing to do to do to see that social justice is achieved?

Thank you,

Edward A. Greenhalgh

Date 13 March 2005 Document sent to the RCMP Public Complaints Commission. Attention Commissioner Shirley Heafey , and Mr. Holland.

Title: INTENT TO DECEIV E; The Holocaust Denial and the University of Waterloo 's False Assurances. The Failings of procedural etiquette vs. a real investigation .The RCMP performed procedural etiquette in order to avoid finding wrongdoing.

Subtitle : In Order to Demonstrate the Intent to Deceive of the RCMP PCC Report dated 28 Feb. 05 Comparison Must be Made to Similar Acts of Denial of the Holocaust using Intent to Deceive.

The whole issue is: Did the Authorities responsible for written signed assurances at the University of Waterloo, specifically the then Pres. /CEO Douglas Wright and Dean of Science/Chair, Dr. J. E. Thompson, commit an honest mistake vs. a premeditated act WITH THE INTENT TO DECEIVE. They were willing to (knowingly) violate not only the letter of the law/federal regulations, but the SPIRIT of these federal programs as well in order to achieve private gain/goals (not necessarily in the interests of the taxpayers funding the programs)? This is what the RCMP was asked to investigate. The truthful answers to these questions are what is being that alleged everyone is covering up.

The Holocaust Denial

1. Signed Death certificates by licensed doctors, so ALL deaths were natural. NO MURDERS OCCURRED!!!!!!
2. Bodies in large numbers could not have been burnt because sufficient amounts of coal were never delivered to the camps to burn that amount of bodies as per energy requirements. Documentation proves this to be true.

Therefore, under the ETIQUETTE OF PROCEDURE as used by Officer Foster, and Com. Shirley Heafey , the Holocaust never occurred. And similarly the 28 Feb. 05 report is valid. Wrong, the Holocaust deniers LIED! Unfortunately, like a Zundel, you have helped UW in its lie: Intent to Deceive.

FACT; (as any good police officer should know) ANY signed certificate may be falsified to suit personal agendas.

Present Example: The Tainted Blood Scandal has recorded Canadian Min. of Health Doctors signing false assurances on the safety of the blood supply to ensure maximum profit for the client. Private agenda/gain over the truth does occur with Min. Health of documents, but it is still wrongdoing.

Foster did not perform a thorough, acceptable police investigation by filing his report before consulting Greenhalgh because the VICTIM (like a survivor) would have exposed where CEO Wright and Dr. Thompson LIED. It is therefore alleged this to be an intentional action necessary for the RCMP to cover up federal regulation violations and for the intent to deceive to succeed the RCMP could not risk this exposure. Solution, write the report without further consulting Greenhalgh so the inaccuracies would not be noted. Hence, according to you and your methods, no possible murders could have occurred at Auschwitz !!!

FACT: the Nazis developed new burning methods that did not need large amounts of coal but used the human fat from the corpses. Yes, large numbers of bodies were burnt, and murder had occurred on a large scale.

Present Day Example: The Blood Scandal Personnel LIED; they said no blood test existed to detect the virus. False :INTENT TO DECEIVE. Also proves that Min. of Health officials do act in a conspiracy to cover up wrongdoing with the intent to deceive. BASIS and FOUNDATION and PRECEDENCE that CEO Wright and Dr J. E. Thompson would lie, and expect to get away with it on Min. of Health forms/programs. Indeed, it appears to be a Standard Operating practice. Hence, a reason for Foster and the RCMP PCC to avoid the issue of lying by UW in the report.

FACT: UW did not commit an honest mistake with J.C.M. Riley but acted in premeditation with the deliberate intent to deceive to gain personal private ends with a blatant disregard for the spirit of the federal regulations, and generally with contempt for the taxpayer.

Foster never asked (and you have VOLUMES of evidence written by Greenhalgh):

1. Was Riley actually specifically qualified to be in a BIOLOGY Ph.D. program? Ans. NO!
2. Did Greenhalgh produce research proving not only Riley and Carlson wrong, but also threatening the funding of Dr.J.E.Thompson; a motive for him to lie to Foster? Ans., Yes!
3. Did Greenhalgh get competent outside authority to support his contentions and present, MAKE AWARE, the flaws in the Riley/Carlson AND Thompson research. Was there realistic expert opinion that the University of Waterloo may be wrong? I.E., like there may be a virus in the blood? Ans. Yes! One of N. America 's leading experts was as a fact. The man who invented the theory that was at the center of the argument.
4. Did Greenhalgh produce a simple but realistic and practical test to prove the research was flawed? Ans. YES! And just like the Blood Scandal Doctors, UW refused to use it because it would have interfered with their intent to deceive. Note, put an antioxidant in the Riley work: Foster had this evidence.
5. WAS UW approached by a large law firm that made them very aware of the situation; i.e., they can't claim they didn't know (you know, the old we didn't know that Jews were being murdered syndrome excuse)? Ans. Yes. They have NO excuse; all they have is proof of their intent to deceive!!!!!!!!!

Like the Holocaust, they, UW, cannot escape their own actions, UNLESS the RCMP/RCMP-PCC wants to be their willing accomplice, their own Ernst Zundel so to speak, and co-conspire to cover up and deny! Are you going to ?

Another area Officer Foster crossed the line was his deliberate WRITTEN judgment included in the report which only possible inclusion would be to slander and demean the victim. Greenhalgh, Foster, wrote should get on with his life. However, Foster did not include all the evidence of MALICIOUS blacklisting that prevented this. Indeed, the blacklisting was necessary to keep Greenhalgh from repeating the work because; 1.he would expose UW's wrongdoing, and 2. They, UW plagiarized the research, and 3. It would affect a criminal case at Yale in the US , and 4. Dr.J.E.Thompson is guilty of stealing the research to start a company under the Center of Excellence scheme based on Greenhalgh's theories. Thompson is liable to Greenhalgh for millions of dollars, and could also be sued by his US partners. All motive for UW to lie to Foster, and motive for political pressure to be put on the RCMP to enter into a conspiracy of intent to deceive. Foster's comment must also be ranked with the comment, “it was the Jews own fault the Holocaust occurred.” And the victims should have no rights to go after Ford Motor Co. for profiting off their slave labour after all the years. Foster and the RCMP seem not to believe in the victim's (Greenhalgh) Rights under the Charter.

In conclusion, my complaint never centered on PROCEDURAL ETIQUETTE, but on the evidence that the RCMP NEVER performed a REAL criminal investigation. The evidence proves that the only investigation that occurred was the kind a Holocaust denier would enact in order to cover up wrong doing in order to protect political friends, one specifically named is, CEO Douglas Wright.

And the evidence also alleges your own (RCMP-PCC) intent to deceive: a good investigator sees through the lies to get to the truth, while a Zundel type accepts the lies to hide the truth. So, once more, here is the most basic question, IS RESEARCH DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL Min. Health documents a “shit” and can't be replicated, EXCELLENT? Yes or no? Is this VERY LOW standard of science the one YOU want protecting your own families? Should the Taxpayer expect higher standards? We must ask them. And if you /RCMP/Min. Health are willing to enter into a conspiracy with the intent to deceive, to condone lying in science, how in heaven's name can the government protect the public from another Tainted Blood Scandal, or another Mad Cow disaster. The answer is unless you are willing to enforce the law, use its deterrent power to protect the public interest, health and safety, you can't and won't. And the crazy thing is, you have spent all this money fighting someone whose research has over and over been proven correct, whose work asks can we stop an airborne disease epidemic before it is too late. You have wasted the taxpayers' money covering up for J.C.M.Riley, whose only accomplishment is to receive a Ph.D. for work officially recognized as “shit.” You should be very embarrassed and worried for your families' safety because you only have people like Riley to protect them from new diseases and bad drugs.

. Think about it. And that is the crux of the entire issue, the public health and safety being compromised by corrupt government agencies and personnel. That is why this must be made public domain with a completely open Public Inquiry being held.

Thank you. Edward A.Greenhalgh

9 Mar. 05 Title : Shirley Heafey and The RCMP Public Complaints Commission have crossed the line and have participated in a criminal cover up of felony and federal wrong doing.

Dear Commissioner Shirley Heafey, your commission has crossed the line from being an independent investigator of complaints to a active conspirator in a cover up of federal felony. I have just received today your "final" report dated 28 Feb. 2005. This is most strange since I have received your "final " report previously. This new final report corresponds directly with approaches made to the Prime Ministers office with allegations that former Min of Health and now Deputy PM Anne McClellan could be charged with obstruction of justice in her failure to ensure Ministry of Health specifications were fulfilled. This must be seen to be more than a coincidence. It smacks of conspiracy all the way to the PMO, irregardless of PM Martin's (false) assurances that he would end cronyism. Funny how all of my concerns center around FALSE ASSURANCES. Your report fails because it intentionally wants to fail :your willingness to accept false assurance (LIES) in order to protect Douglas Wright and Dr.J.E.Thompson of the University of Waterloo. They lied. Intentionally. It is against ALL federal regulations ,US and Canada to deliberately lie. In my last correspondence to you I asked for evidence that Foster, or ANYONE in the RCMP interviewed Douglas Wright , then Pres. and CEO of UW and Dr. Thompson. You have FAILED TO PRODUCE THIS EVIDENCE!!! You can not because they were never interviewed. they are responsible for the fraud and violation of federal standards , The Min. of Health Act of Parliament . They committed federal violations. And you wrote your report in such a way as to hide this fact. INTENT TO DECEIVE: you are guilty of an ACT OF FRAUD yourselves.
Your willingness to actively deceive explains why the public is endangered by federal agencies, i.e., how Mad cow was allowed to destroy the Canadian cattle industry. how the Tainted Blood was allowed to kill people.My allegations all hinge on the answers you received from Douglas Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson. Prove you interviewed these persons who are central to the crime or be proven criminals yourselves. Provide the evidence with questions and answers . I do not believe you can, and therefore, I believe there is sufficient evidence to support the allegations that you are actively engaged in a conspiracy to cover up criminal felony and federal violations to protect not only Douglas Wright and Dr.Thompson but probably Bob Rae and Rosemary Brown and to prevent the impeachment of Trevor Eyton from the Senate as well. This request most likely involves not only the PMO , but the power broker from Ontario, Bill Davis. As you see the allegations are sufficiently serious enough that a PUBLIC INQUIRY becomes an absolute necessity to separate the innocent fro the corrupt criminals . I am forwarding a copy of this to PM Martin as well.
I am truly sorry that you appear to be a corrupt organization. Thank you. Edward A.Greenhalgh

Hank McKinnell

CEO and Chairman

Pfizer

235 East 42 St.,

N.Y , N.Y. 10017 USA

Ph., 1-212-733-2323

Dear CEO Hank McKinnell:

In response to your PBS/Charlie Rose appearance promoting your book, “A Call to Action “ I have sent you this serious material. General Mitchell was also a call to action as a man who stood up for his beliefs for a safer society. I too have stood up in the name of the public good and hope as such that you will hear me out since you are a person in a position to do good if you so choose. Who am I? A scientist who has published three single author papers without a PhD and has been blacklisted so much so that a former US Surgeon General regretted my treatment. Whose theories Noam Chomsky has said may be of phenomenal importance to mankind. All noted on my website, www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com where you should read the 2004 revised section as it is very important. Further revisions are in progress with a massive email campaign planned. What you need to see is the discussion on evolution and the part flus play: please note the comments on SARS becoming airborne and avian flu being directly transmissible to humans long before the” experts” found the same answer (important consideration). Big Point: AIDS is explained in the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life (VTT, see Dr.Lovelock's comments, Coombe Mill letter on the website menu) as an evolutionary event. Africa will survive AIDS with a reduced population, but they will be changed genetically to a “new” man while we in the west will not have changed. And they will develop new flus, which they will be resistant to but we will not. Hence, the new man will repopulate the environment we vacant when we die from the new flus. An evolutionary mechanism for change as explained on the website. How much do you love your kids? Enough to help the research?

See the enclosed serious material: April 2005 letter to RCMP Commissioner Zaccardelli and the June 2005 reply (admits it is important for a national debate, but avoids doing his duty), emails proposals to Merck, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others. Point I asked Melinda Gates, as a mother what she should do to protect her children so the public could compare her reply to their own. I also asked PM Paul Martin if he was a bad grandpa? Martin did nothing and the Gates gave a strange form reply: They made no conscious answer but talked about colleagues? I asked serious questions, so how can scientific advances be made if such a powerful man as Bill Gates can't even read, or more importantly, doesn't want to? Re call Gen. Mitchell, did anyone listen? I am approaching you, Pfizer as a demonstration (to the public), the lights are on, but is anyone home?

There are too many gatekeepers in our society simply blocking the way. No intelligence is necessary just rote. How can you advance discoveries if people are willing to cover up wrongdoing? Simply censoring Gen. Mitchell didn't make your country safer did it? Point of fact, the University of Waterloo committed academic fraud in order to do a friend's kid a favour; it did not matter if they blocked cancer research. Drs. Thompson and M.M.Buhr found it necessary for their advancements. They could not comprehend the simple chemistry of rigor mortis. If you ask them NOW they can explain it clearly, but at the critical moment in history they couldn't comprehend. Like VTT and new flus now. And the Endocrinological Society betrayed the public when they replied in 92 that the Cell Death Signal Gene would be important to cancer BUT sooner or later someone else would find the same thing. Is this the research philosophy of Pfizer too? If it is then maybe you now have your answer for Charlie Rose when he asked you why the public mistrusts the pharmaceutical industry. And industry standards are set by the lowest standard industry is willing to accept. Is the Pfizer standard the UW/Riley standard that is officially described in derogatory terms? Acceptance means you do nothing, a higher standard is demonstrated by helping those who demand better. I demand better. Do you love your children? What standard is good enough for them?

I am asking Pfizer for help to fund the completion of the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life based on the fact that my work has been proven to be correct on many levels. The reason I am black listed is that many corrupt people simply do not want to honestly and openly compete. They want accomplices to be bad scientists and bad human beings. What I found in 87 with Cell Death Signal Gene was that many scientists were simply making up research and referencing false references and other bad science practices. This has been all proven over the years. By funding VTT, as explained to Merck and others, I would be able to repeat what I did with Cell Death and compare all the literature making important contrasts and observations that would clear away many unsubstantiated and bad science theories so important work could proceed. Sounds too simple, but be aware a biology PhD was granted to C-physics BSc and many high ranking US government officials went along with the cover up. Then the compiled result of VTT could be presented in a professional and COLLEGIATE manner in an UNBIASED presentation for public debate. What could be fairer? You need E=MC2 on paper before any atom could be split.

Is this a final proposal? No. This is a letter of introduction to discover if you really love your children or are just another gatekeeper. Bright good people meet to have a dialogue to exchange ideas. I look forward to your reply. Read the 2004 revised section on my website, then think deeply.

Thank you,

Edward A.Greenhalgh

To: RCMP Commissioner,

Giuliano Zaccardelli,

RCMP Headquarters,

1200 Vanier Parkway ,

Ottawa , ON . , K1A 0r2

Ph. 613-993-0303

The Question is whether the RCMP enforces the

28 April 2005 Law EQUALLY for ALL Canadians , or selectively

And covers up for the wealthy elite and corrupt?

The Question is whether the Charter of Rights and

Freedoms have any REAL value in Canadian Society Will the RCMP respect and enforce the

Federal Law, and Regulations? Charter,

*** PUBLIC DOMAIN***

Dear RCMP Commissioner, G. Zarccardelli:

You are directly sent this very serious letter requesting fraud and other intent to deceive charges be laid against the Administration of the University of Waterloo, specifically naming former Pres./CEO Douglas Wright and former Dean of Science/Biology Chair, Dr. J .E. Thompson, because you represent the head of authority and accountability at the RCMP. You represent responsibility to Canadian citizens and the Constitution, and the public good /safety. The deterrent property of the law protects the public. Several serious issues will be raised based upon these themes, especially the Constitution and the result is meant to benefit a better society. I can not understate how serious this letter is and must emphasize that due to the corruption I have encountered with government( which is the same as being exposed now publicly), and that it will be made public domain on the website, www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com so the public may help too with issues of public concern. The Gomery Commission is proving that public exposure is the only way to deal with corruption, and so justifies my now asking you to RE-OPEN the FRAUD/CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION and charge the University of Waterloo . The Basis and Foundation will be provided forthwith.

Enclosed are copies of emails to: 1) P.M. Paul Martin, 2) Justice Min. I. Cotler, and 3)Comm. Shirley Heafey & RCMP-PCC, specifically the material titled:”INTENT TO DECEIVE: The Holocaust Denial and the University of Waterloo 's False Assurances. The Failings of procedural etiquette in order to avoid finding wrongdoing.” The evidence clearly shows that a REAL criminal investigation never occurred but rather the evidence alleges that a politically inspired cover up occurred. Therefore, you must re-open the investigation to deal with these most serious allegations. Please note the email requests for a public inquiry.

MOST BASIC QUESTION

As A police officer you have only one question; “What federal laws or Acts of Parliament were violated and by whom?”

FACT: Answer the question (with out the political interference) from the evidence, and then your job requires you to turn it over to the Crown. Then the Crown, not the RCMP, may be judged by the public whether or not they are corrupt.

ANS. The Administration of the University of Waterloo, specifically, CEO Douglas Wright and Dr.J.E.Thompson acted with the INTENT TO DECEIVE and violated a federal Act of Parliament requiring research to be truthful and of value to the taxpayer be produced (not for personal agendas) under the Min. of Health so to commit fraud for personal gain. They, in premeditation, gave deliberate false signed assurances for scholarship money under a joint federal US-Canada scholarship agreement in order to achieve a scholarship otherwise unobtainable if the truth were told for J.C.M. Riley and to continue overall funding for outdated research while blocking research of value to understanding cancer. They did this for the personal benefit of the Riley family not the taxpayers of Canada and the US . They deliberately lied for personal gain INTENTING TO DECEIVE the LETTER and SPIRIT of the law, Acts of Parliament and the International (NIH-Min. Health) agreements. This was not an accident, mistake nor of any benefit to the taxes payers. It was solely for the benefit of private interests.

To prove the above all the RCMP had to do was to INTERVIEW and ASK CEO Douglas Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson a very few simple questions: their own answers would prove the fraud. The RCMP-PCC email proves this never occurred. So, for the benefit of the public a sample investigative interview is presented.

1. Was J.C.M. Riley a proper biology Ph.D? Candidate with a full biology background?

Ans. No. He was a C- physics BSc. So special circumstances were fabricated for him. Are these circumstances fabricated for the children of ordinary taxpayers or was this special because he had special family connections? Special ability?

Ans. He had no special ability and no, ordinary students would not receive this special consideration, only someone with his family connections.

1. Did E.A.Greenhalgh's research prove the Riley Ph.D. to be wrong? If he was wrong would he get the NIH scholarship?

Ans. Yes, he was wrong, and had the Greenhalgh work not been suppressed he would not even have graduated?

1. Did the University of Waterloo ask of a student, Greenhalgh extraordinary efforts to prove his theories.

Ans. Oh, yes, quite unfair too. He provided theories we could have checked on paper if we wanted to, but we didn't. We asked him to get one outside competent authority, and he amazingly brought the man, who developed the theory from a leading cancer institute, and he even provided a simple scientific test that was quite easy to use (add an anti-oxidant) to Riley's work and it would fail. We didn't care, it was the time of the Tainted Blood Scandal and we expected to be allowed to lie like they did at the Blood Testing Center .

1. Wasn't Dr. J.E.Thompson's own research based on the faulty Riley research? Wasn't Thompson on the Riley committee?

Ans. Oh, yes, that's why we chose Thompson, so Riley would get a free ride. Who knew the whole biology department was wrong. Just like McLeod vs. Banting. We wanted the funding for the department to continue so scientific answers weren't important, simply keeping the money coming was. You see Wright wanted UW to gain international prestige, so you can't have a Riley exposed as your standard of

Excellence can you?

1. So both CEO Wright and Dr. Thompson were aware of their actions and had motives when they signed deliberately false assurances for J.C.M.Riley?

Ans. Oh, yes, we had the political connections to do whatever we pleased.

So, you see, Commissioner Zarccardelli from the role-play of the questions your investigator should have asked why charges should have been laid.

NOW RE-OPEN THE INVESTIGATION AND ASK THE QUESTIONS FOR REAL!!!! Public exposure is essential to this case.

Before continuing, there are important precedents to be established.

1. Skakel vs. Oberlander

Mr. Skakel (sic) is the “Kennedy cousin” who murdered a neighbour girl when he was approximately 17 years old back in the 70s.Many years later he was tried and convicted as an adult. Point, he committed one stupid act as teenager for which he was held accountable even though he was rich. Please note, he attended no classes on murder nor swore any oaths in order to commit his one tragic mistake.

Mr. Oberlander is a very rich connected man in Kitchener Waterloo. As a 17 year old he was a member of a Nazi SS death squad, though he claims only as an interpreter. The point is that to be in the SS you were chosen by competing, wanting to be in, attended classes and swore oaths to exterminate undesirable people. The SS smashed babies heads in with rifle butts for fun. And being in the SS you received extra benefits. Mr. Oberlander lied to get into Canada . He has benefited from all his acts and never held accountable.

Please, Canadian MPs have helped him fight deportation, but have done nothing to help a Canadian citizen with research of benefit to cancer. Mr. Oberlander is wealthy elite, like Douglas Wright, while I am not. Is that what the RCMP supports. Douglas Wright said in a newspaper, the “elite should rule.” Do you RCMP Commissioner agree? Is he above the law? Please note, I have asked P.M. Paul Martin for a public inquiry.

2.The Constitution and the Public Good

1. Under the constitution any citizen with ability has a right to an education and employment. The University of Waterloo has denied this to me; and the children of other taxpayers. They have said they will fix scholarships and positions so only the ones they choose will receive benefits paid for by taxpayers. This is a motive for the RCMP's first investigation to fail, to prevent this being exposed to the public. Riley is the tip of an iceberg: positions at universities and government and scholarships are rigged as to be patently dishonest so chosen elite children receive these at the request of their sponsor. The taxpayers are cheated. The ordinary citizen has no rights under the Constitution. Wright proclaimed the elite shall rule. This is how they are guaranteed the best positions; by cheating .An inquiry would help expose this.
2. How Criminal Acts Condoned by the University of Waterloo Adversely affect Safety. Already cited, lying by Dr.Thompson was equivalent to the lying by the health officials of the Tainted Blood. Point, scientists who lie are a danger to Canada . Another example, the Mad Cow disaster. Who told who cannibalizing cows was safe? This will only be proven unacceptable if you lay the charges; otherwise you are not protecting the public. You may be protecting the rich elite from liability, but you are not serving the taxpayers and other citizens under the Constitution.

Please note, based on the corruption at UW, I predicted a Walkerton water disaster years before it happened (you have the evidence). Recently, we have seen flu kits sent out with 1957 killer flu, and it was only a fluke a disaster did not happen. This too has been predicted by me based on the incompetence and low scientific standards shown by the University of Waterloo and J.C.M.Riley (standard of excellence, not). This is why my website has the title Bad Biotech. Please note, I have discussed on my website the dangers of emerging diseases possibly hastened by GM manipulation and cited the need for research. The government is too busy covering up for corrupt friends whom they have given millions of dollars, than to help me do this research. Commissioner, if a new disease occurs and kills your family, how will you feel that this research was blocked to cover up for incompetence and corruption? Protect society, re-open the investigation, make them prove that there are high standards protecting your family and society.

Please note that the Chancellor Lazaridis and founder of RIM has developed a Conference Center to discuss human rights abuse in the third world. He is as bad as any leader in the third world because he may well be part of my human rights abuse. A public inquiry should examine what role he has played in the cover up and Charter abuses. RIM money may well have influenced the RCMP. Everyone in the world who owns a blackberry should text message Dr.Lazaridis and ask him what his role was in blocking cancer research? It is only fair, don't you think because; RIM is now publicly promoting its Perimeter Center for advances in technology!! Do you know who made incredible advances in tech in the past? The Nazis!!! They were absolutely incredible and, yet they had no compassion for human rights. Good point for public discussion because on my website I discuss the misuse of Embryonic Stem Cell research questioning how women in the third world may be paid to have abortions on demand to supply research etc., needs. This would be a dreadful misuse of human rights. Do you know who has bad human rights records in the third world and Indonesia? Canadian business people. Please recall CEO Douglas Wright's motto was to have millionaires in the halls, not ethical science!!!

In all fairness, on my website I request the Canadian government to test the scientists who are setting the stem cell guidelines to answer the troublesome UW question publicly. To answer the question, is research described in official government documents in derogatory terms, excellent, yes or no? I have no takers! I directly asked P.M. Martin to also ask Drs. Low and Plummer, but he and they did not reply. In fairness let us ask the public to ask the brilliant scientists at the RIM Perimeter to answer this question and compare their answers to the public. It is only fair.

THE CHARTER

Commissioner Zaccardelli, by covering up the fraud my Charter Rights have been violated (political influence caused my lawyers to commit an unethical act, already presented in evidence so don't talk about a civil case. The civil case would have exposed the fraud, so it had to be interfered with). Do you support the Charter, that the law is good for the little guy and the BIG Elitist equally without prejudice? Support means action, not lip service: lay the fraud charges.

More importantly for society, the greater harm is the black listing. Criminals like Wright succeed when their corruption succeeds and (like the Nazis) they have power through manipulating political power to inflict fear. Black listing steals a person's income, pension and is a form of terrorism. Present day example causing harm to society: Mad Cow Disaster. We now know vets who wanted to report cases of Mad Cow were threatened with job and pension loss: that is bad government and bad biotech which threatens peoples health. So if the RCMP really does work to protect the health and safety of society you must lay the charges so this brand of terrorism can be stopped.

Additional harm UW corruption does to Charter Rights is cheating the ordinary taxpayers' children out of positions that are funded by tax dollars. The Riley case is the tip of an iceberg; in fact the present Pres. Of UW Mr. Johnson was involved in such a case in Quebec before coming to Ontario . A public inquiry may also open this matter again, which appears to have been “heavy handed” manipulated. Example to test the quality of students in Ontario universities is to review the “Godsoe “ letter on my website, and you will see a student, an undergrad is given a scholarship to study breast cancer for her entire university career: a guaranteed job. Is this person a “Riley”? Lets find out by publicly checking their personal standards and ethics and see if they can tell the truth. Ask this person, is research described in official government documents in derogatory terms, EXCELLENT? Yes, or no? And compare it to any the public cares to make. Point, researchers if they are to benefit society must be free to tell the truth no matter what. I t may mean the difference between life and death. And the public can find out if the competition was open and fair, not prefabricated.

Special Case: I keep saying research of value to cancer was suppressed; Cell Death Signal gene as explained to Min. of Health circa 1987, “wouldn't honest cancer researchers want to know?” Dr. Tak Mak heads the Cancer group in Toronto , and he may even have his daughters working for him. Are they superior researchers or just people cashing in on cronyism and the misuse of cancer donations? Lets check. An honest researcher should be able to answer this question, “Is research documented in derogatory terms by the Min. of Health EXCELLENT? Yes or no? Simple question, will they publicly answer?

Special Case: Motive for Politicians to Influence the RCMP

Circa the Riley investigation an American student graduated from Yale with scholarships etc., and he was stupid enough to state publicly he fabricated his marks to get into Yale, and Yale wasn't so tough. Yale used the threat of criminal prosecution as leverage against him. Can you imagine the lawsuit this person could have launched against Yale if the Riley scholarship was made public at the time? A very good motive to block the RCMP investigation.

The Paul Bernardo Precedent

Paul Bernardo tortured, raped and murdered two young women, and some have argued Bernardo could have been caught earlier except a grandfather who was a prominent KW judge shielded him. The allegation is had he not had this special IMMUNITY from the law the murders would never had occurred. Like the Riley special circumstances, a demonstration of the harm that results when laws and their deterrent values are disrespected by those in power. Please note, Bernardo has received hundreds of dollars for his Charter Rights and appeal funding, but the government of Canada fight s me when I discuss funding to help fight emerging diseases and cancer etc. Think about it!

WHO SHIELDED THE UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO/WHO BLOCKED CANCER RESEARCH

1. Brian Mulroney, see the Jeff Foster reply, “PM Mulroney is aware “, and PM Mulroney was personal friend of Douglas Wright and made him his educational advisor. So although Mulroney may be aware of new cancer ideas patronage for friend's kids is more important than saving lives.
2. fmr Premier Bill Davis who controls many scholarships and is a friend to many elite families has a library named after him at UW and was a friend of Wright's.
3. And Bob Rae, fmr Ont. Premier, is a family friend of Bill Davis.
4. John Rae, brother of Bob, heads the large wealthy Power Corp with many legal connections and was advisor to
5. Fmr P.M. Jean Chretien who did many favours for UW
6. Cabinet Min. Boudrieau received a UW degree while sitting in Parliament
7. Lib. M.P.Andrew Telegdi did many favours for UW
8. Lib. M.P. John English was a UW prof and now works for RIM/UW
9. Trevor Eyton was a UW Senator appointed Canadian Senator by B.Mulroney and heads the powerful Brascan group with many legal connections
10. Rosemary Brown a NDP member with Bob Rae and a Commissioner with the Ontario Human Rights Commission, who, if the fraud charges are laid could be charged as an accessory after the fact and obstruction of justice with the other commissioners (the Yale special case cover up).
11. John Manley, fmr liberal cabinet minister is a UW grad. He should publicly answer the special question.

And there are more, but a full public inquiry will separate the corrupt criminals from the bystanders. You do get the point though, Commissioner Zaccardelli, in light of the Sponsorship Scandal there is a very REAL basis to cite cover up and political interference and to re-open the investigation. The integrity and commitment to the public of the RCMP is now being questioned. Please be fully aware on the basis of the Gomery inquiry and exposure of corruption, this letter will be made public domain, it is in the public's best interest to do so.

In conclusion, I have demonstrated many areas of public benefit from this case going forward. I can not conceive of any GOOD ones for it not to. As a police officer you have only one question to answer; is there evidence that Wright and Thompson had INTENT TO DECEIVE when they signed assurances for J.C.M.Riley? Did they have motive to lie? Was there reasonable evidence to prove the research was invalid and unworthy? Will the public benefit? What are YOU going to do, sir? I have cited the law, the Charter, and the public safety, plus benefits to ordinary taxpayers. In all fairness, as a police officer all you have to do is turn the evidence over to the Crown that is your duty to the Constitution and the taxpayers. If the Crown and the Courts are corrupt, then let the public judge them, you do your duty to the public and the RCMP. And what we are learning from the Gomery inquiry, the more corruption is exposed in the public, and then it can be dealt with effectively. What are you going to do, Sir?

Thank you,

Very truly,

Edward A.Greenhalgh

THE BIRD FLU: THE DANGER OF CRONYISM

The public believes (wrongly) that their tax dollars are used by the federal government to advance truthful independent science, which serves to protect them from new emerging diseases. Unfortunately, I have experienced first hand that this is not true. Necessary media examples are the knowingly shipped contaminated blood by Canadian federal scientist that contaminated the world's blood supply, and the Mad cow tragedy where USDA vets were threatened by federal bureaucrats to keep them from warning society. Government and industry have become one and the same while forgetting who is actually paying for the federal programs and the enforcement of safety standards: the taxpayers. The taxpayer is not protected.

The bird flu may again serve as the next example (after ENRON and the FEMA/Katrina) of government failure to safeguard the public due to cronyism overriding the common good. President Bush now knows that America can NOT produce vaccines or medicines to ensure that the public is protected. America does NOT even have the scientific capacity (shades of Iraq and WMDs) to meet this challenge but is dependent upon foreign sources like Chiron) who can not guarantee anything. And now President Bush, like FEMA and Mike Brown, wants to protect the public by asking the pharmaceuticals to quickly produce vaccines for which he will pass laws protecting them from liability. Is this in your best interests?

I said I dealt with this first hand, which you can see on my website, www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com and read the August 2005 Revised Section /Red Zone wherein you will see my research proposals concerning the flu and vaccines a year before this became a media event (indeed it goes back ten years or more). And you may read the replies from Pfizer, Merck and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation plus others, but the bottom line is they did not fund the research and there was NO issue of liability. So the question must be asked, why didn't they fund the research?

One possible answer is cronyism. The head of the USDA was once head of Monsanto and my theories wonder about the possible involvement of genetically modified grains being used in bird feed now grown in Asia by Monsanto. If the research established (in order to better understand the mechanisms generating new flu) a potential link between GM crops and this bird flu then Monsanto may well be liable for all the losses the farmers are experiencing. The government could be juggling (again) the public's safety with concerns for Monsanto's financial health. This question can not be scientifically answered if the research is not allowed to go forward. And I believe it is in the public's best interest that these concerns be addressed.

Other topics on the website are liability and whistleblower protection. An honest mistake is an honest mistake, but when the Canadian federal scientists shipped the contaminated blood it was in the full knowledge that it was contaminated: bottom line greed! So if a pharmaceutical makes an honest mistake, that is one thing, but if it is guaranteed by the President a “license to kill”-no liability, that is another. Therefore, if a company has a vaccine failure and knowingly ships it should NOT be allowed to escape liability and the only way to ensure that is by the President also signing into law Whistle Blower protection so an honest scientist can speak up and save lives.

These are may concerns about the public health and safety and hope that you share them. Thank you. Edward A.Greenhalgh

2006 REVISION: THE GOLD ZONE

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS ( USA AND CANADA ) ALLOW THE VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL MANDATES AND REGULATIONS SO CRONIES MAY ACHIEVE PRIVATE PERSONAL GAIN AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TAXPAYER, PUBLIC SAFETEY AND THE BETRAYAL OF TRUST.

Keywords: cancer, viruses, stem cells, bird flu, AIDS, TAGGED FOR DEATH, evolutionary danger emerging diseases. The Universities of Waterloo (RIM) and Yale. Bill Gates/Microsoft, Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline.Bill Clinton and Monsanto USDA. Mutagens, genetically modified organisms GMOs, environmental stress, Canadian Ministry of Health. The US Health and Human Services (HHS/NIH), Dr.Anthony Faucci.Unethical science, a lack of integrity in the scientific community and collegiality is propaganda for cronyism.

Why they lie. What they gain. What the public loses. How society is endangered.

FACT: U.S Rep. Cunningham (2006) has been given a federal prison sentence and others are under investigation in the Abramoff Lobbying Scandal.

FACT: From the Canadian Gomery Inquiry people have been sentenced for fraud in the misuse of federal money/PROGRAMS .The former Canadian Privacy Commissioner and Former PM Chretiens's speechwriter has been criminally charged for fraud and BREACH OF TRUST!

PROVEN : US and Canadian politicians and people in charge of federal programs do commit crimes and act unethically while betraying the public trust in pursuit of private personal gain and agendas.

The above facts were stated because it is essential for the public to appreciate that federal politicians and bureaucrats do commit crimes (they conspire), making it very believable that they could act (conspire) to block cancer and other research to benefit their own personal private agendas, and so private gain (through the misuse of public office and political connections to public office and public programs). They do not care about you (Joe public/taxpayer) but only themselves and are quite capable, after years of familiarity with political procedure, to misuse public programs for their own ends, performing corrupt and unethical acts, misusing, misdirecting public monies meant for honest research, for private goals, even if it means you could die (proof, the contaminated blood supply). What you must appreciate is that it affects you NOW, and why your help is needed more than ever.

Will the bird flu be the world's big flu pandemic killing millions as in 1919? Even though I have written many people dating back to circa 1992 on the flu as an evolutionary control mechanism, I don't have that answer. However, the REAL danger may be the interaction of the bird flu with the AIDS virus in Africa . Again this theory pre-dates to the early nineties and some of the material is on the website as early research proposals to the major international pharmaceutical companies, like GlaxoSmithKline. Note how many (pharmaceutical companies) don't do basic research in Canada ; and we later learn that they don't even do vaccine research in the US either. Where are the miracles coming from that the new 2006 pharma TV ad says is coming if they don't do basic research in North America ? The theory interrelates the cancer virus and the AIDS virus (same families) and the Mad cow disease family (prions) in a theory called V.T.T. (the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life) which states that flues are Evolution's messengers that act to speed up or slow down evolution in response to the ENVIRONMENT'S NEEDS (see Mass Extinction/SARS on the menu of the Green section, its not about SARS but how the destruction of the environment speeds up the effect: pollution and environmental damage causes diseases to alleviate the pressure by killing off the offending species). I am a cancer survivor who used my own research to beat cancer: some of my detractors have died of cancer. Point made, I have put my own life on the line for my research, and my research has repeatedly been proven correct. So much so, people who originally suppressed my work (the University of Waterloo/RIM) have stolen it and used political connections to get away with it. Note how the culture of plagiarism, cronyism and unethical acts cultivated by the University of Waterloo can be reflected to RIM and their patents infringement suits in the US . The University of Waterloo has developed a culture of corruption and intellectual property theft that would make the Asian markets pirates green with envy. Please realize suppressing research receiving US federal monies is a flagrant violation of US Federal Mandates under HHS. It is also a violation of Canadian Federal Mandates: see opening Facts! And because it is proven that both governments have covered up this lying to protect Waterloo and Yale universities, why should you believe your government when it says a vaccine would be safe for you to use? WHY?

THE MOST SIMPLE CASE

VTT states that ALL cancers are viruses: some call them oncogenes, which have a special relationship with all genomes of all living organisms (and is important to understanding evolution and how life evolved). Sounds simple, but the ramifications (control of the signals controls cancer and could do away with most conventional treatments in a very short time) are important and makes a LOT of cancer researchers very jealous and mean spirited because it means that they are no longer the SINGULAR experts. Like spoiled children, they must share their toy, and they DON'T want to! Nobel prize winner, Dr. Kary Mullis has publicly stated that most cancer researchers are lying to keep their high paying jobs. The American Cancer Society is made up of former pharmaceutical company cancer researchers. Neat relationship? Can you understand why I am blacklisted and why you must help if the research is to go forward? I can't overcome the suppression and blacklisting without the public's help.

Another important obvious fact is that both Waterloo and Yale have political and business connections that protect them from the enforcement of the law.

PENN AND TELLER/MISDIRECTION

If you are familiar with the two famous magicians, then you are aware that they constantly tell you that they will DELIBERATELY MISDIRECT your attention so a trick will work. This is what the Canadian federal police (RCMP) did, and to a lesser extent, the FBI.In the previous Red Zone you will see correspondence to the Commissioner of the RCMP, G.Zarcardelli, and how the RCMP investigation is compared to the Holocaust Denial. To criticize a federal police investigation there better be a solid basis; here it is. The RCMP NEVER investigated former President and CEO, Douglas Wright, and former Dean of Science, Biology Chair, Dr. John E. Thompson. This is critical. Instead, they wasted taxpayers' dollars on a phony investigation (secretaries and procedure) in order to create MISDIRECTION. Please be very clear, it is:

•  Douglas Wright, and

2.Dr. John E. Thompson

who are being charged/alleged with federal felony of a federal program/money /fraud. Corporate felony. No one else. And, the RCMP never:

1.produced the documents they signed for the J.C.M. Riley NIH federal scholarship, NOR,

2. personally interviewed EITHER of the suspects.

Let me make this perfectly clear: it is as if the federal prosecutors in the World com/ENRON cases only interviewed secretaries and filing clerks, but NEVER spoke with Ebbers(sic), Skilling, nor Lay. Do you understand the effect that would have on the findings (lack of) of the investigation? No charges could be laid. Evers, Skiling, and Lay etc. would never go to court. The RCMP never, I repeat, never, interviewed CEO Douglas Wright, nor Dr. J.E.Thompson. And CEO Wright and Dr.J.E.Thompson both committed federal felony fraud by giving DELIBERATE FALSE SIGNED ASSURANCES. Read the material to the RCMP;over and over I ask them to PROVE that they interviewed CEO Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson. They have never given the proof but beat around the bush about procedure, you can waste a lot of time with procedure but Wright and Thompson are the main perpetrators. Never have they produced the physical evidence, the NIH/Min. Health documents with their signatures giving SIGNED ASSURANCES that J.C.M.Riley was exceptional and that they were making honest and truthful statements in compliance with the federal regulations. This document proved the federal fraud. Never has the RCMP produced this simple document, but rather the RCMP has engaged in a classic case of MISDIRECTION in order to SHIELD CEO Douglas Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson. Please review the appropriate material in the Red Zone.

IMPORTANCE: later the research that was lost so Thompson could continue receiving grant money (and the rest of the UW biology department) for research that was obsolete, and then they could plagiarize mine as their own, but more directly here I want you to realize one of the dangers of letting a CEO like Douglas Wright believe he is above the law and can escape justice. You must realize how many business and political connections he had. He was a provincial cabinet minister without (apparently) having to be elected (bought his position through connections and money) which means he was very powerful. And that kind of power must be responsible and accountable if people in our society are to be safe. For specific examples, it is not little mistakes in a laboratory that harms the public. A researcher can speak up and say the quality is bad or we made a bad batch. No, it is the powerful business man with the powerful political connections who is the danger. As in the blood contamination, he can over ride the little scientist on the floor (through threats and intimidation and confidentiality clauses and black listing etc., to destroy his life) and cause the dangerous product, a deadly drug (like a vioxx, or a thalidomide or tainted blood or,..., a bad vaccine) to be marketed for profit and expect to get away with (murder) it because of his many powerful connections. No, we have to expect more from a man like Wright and for the public good, health and safety, this kind of man must be HELD ACCOUNTABLE for his actions. It is in the best interests of society.

The US DOJ and the FBI are equally bad in their cover up to protect Yale. Why protect Yale? So Yale could save face and avoid being sued. At the same time as the Riley scholarship fraud, another American student (without political or wealthy connections) forged his transcripts to get into Yale, where he did very well wining scholarships etc. His only mistake was publicly bragging about it saying Yale wasn't so great and was easy. Yale, to save face, and to get back at him, threatened to charge him with felony fraud unless he gave back the scholarship money etc. etc. Had the Canadian Waterloo/Riley scholarship (official forged transcripts) felony fraud had come to light, Yale would have lost;

•  their threat over him

•  he then could have sued Yale for a gazillion dollars

•  Riley and a Yale professor, Dr.H.R.Behrman would have been exposed for plagiarism (of the E.A.Greenhalgh research).

Hence, the DOJ/FBI covered up and failed to file charges. Neat, huh?

I want all Americans serving in the National Guard in Iraq to savour this for a moment. Your government has threatened Guardsmen with criminal charges (some people in their 60s) if they don't report for duty (maybe multiple tours), but refused to charge a Canadian with felony fraud in order to protect Yale, and suppress research mandated by the federal government (like Cancer and AIDS theories). Think about it for a moment and appreciate it.

Please consider this; many scholarships are simply pre-arranged frauds in order to guarantee some wealthy elite families' children positions: guaranteed jobs for life paid for by the taxpayers. And globalization is sending many university grad jobs offshore and everyone is told to adapt to the market and the times; but not the rich elite who are above the law. But no one guarantees your kids a job for life. Jessica Lynch came from a poor rural community and she had to be shot in the Guard before she could get to go to college to become a teacher. Think about it. This case would expose all of this to the public, which is why I allege the DOJ/FBI refused to lay charges. American public, go to the original website Green section and read the DOJ's (Deputy Chief Farrington) comments,” what crime was committed?” Please email the DOJ and tell them fraud. CEO Wright and Dr. Thompson deliberately lied on federal forms for money that they otherwise would not have received had they told the truth. Lying for federal money from federal programs is federal fraud and there are NO statutes of limitations for federal fraud committed against the federal government. What do you in the National Guard think about that? Why do elite wealthy children deserve jobs guaranteed for life, and yours don't?

CATHOLIC PRIESTS MOLESTING ALTAR BOYS: THE MENTOR MODEL

Please note, before I continue, just how many in the academic community are quite happy and content to accept lies and academic fraud and bad standards. The Endocrinlogical Society of USA must be viewed in the same light as the Catholic Church and how they cover up wrong doing. Academic standards are the backbone to academic integrity, and if scientists are allowed to lie and cheat, then there is no good reason to believe new drugs or vaccines are safe. In fact, lying scientists lend credence to the O.J.Simpson defense about the dna testing. Who do you believe? Why do you believe scientists are telling the truth? I presented the Endocrinological Society of USA with proof of plagiarism by my former supervisor and fraud, and they told me he could not have committed plagiarism nor fraud because he was my mentor. Just like the catholic priests could not have sodomized those young boys because they were their mentors. Wrong. There are bad mentors. There are bad institutions. And there are bad journals. Which explains how dangerous drugs get on the market to kill and cripple people. The South Korean researcher lied about his stem cell miracles. Did Dr. Anthony Faucci of NIH expose him? No! I wrote the NIH with the complaint about NIH fraud etc. Did they do anything? No! The NIH is not protecting the public. NIH and Endocrinology USA act as if the American people are the enemy. Note, 911 could have been avoided; indeed an American agent could have prevented it if he had been helped, but Nooooo, the bureaucracy covered up and hindered him. Just like both governments have fought me. Dr. Faucci may not be competent enough to protect the public. Dr. Faucci is on record as saying that 99.999% of researchers are honest. I don't believe Dr. Faucci was lying, I believe he is incompetent, because journals are developing computer programs to check all submitted photos for doctoring /fraud. Dr. Faucci, like Homeland security is out of touch, and I mention this so the public can see exactly what I have had to deal with.

TAGGED FOR DEATH (A Genetic Marker for the [Bird?] Flu)

Why help me? The research has been so suppressed as to be out of date, so why care? Wrong, my detractors, those black listing and suppressing me are like all criminals; they have to suppress good work in order to hide their awful incompetence. Riley is not the exception; he is the standard that most research is done at today, and why my research is so relevant. You have to understand what was going on politically at the University of Waterloo and their direct connection to government, the pharmaceutical industry, Monsanto, the governments of Canada and USA (USDA) and the Universities of Guelph and Manitoba , plus the Center of Excellence program. Douglas Wright was directly connected to former P.M.Brian Mulroney, whose science minister was the former President of the University of Guelph (an agricultural university that was making a deal with Monsanto). The Ministry of Health had the responsibility for research (then MRC) whose President was Dr.H.G.Friesen former Biology Head from the University of Manitoba (which had connections to Guelph and UW). Dr.Thompson was the Dean of Science/Chair at UW and along with the biology dept. received money for research, which I proved wrong. The whole department was wrong. Besides being on the Riley Ph.D committee he also sat on the M.M.Buhr Ph.D. committee, whose work was the basis for the Riley Ph.D., which I proved wrong in just six months. Because the RCMP refuses to release all the details the following is sketchy (I did ask P.M. Paul Martin for a full public inquiry so the whole truth could be known see accompanying section of emails) but generally accurate. If anyone disagrees, please help me in calling for a FULL PUBLIC INQUIRY and ask the present P.M., Stephen Harper to prove he tells the truth when he says there will be ACCOUNTABILITY IN HIS GOVERNMENT. Riley, whose work was wrong was guaranteed apposition at Yale. Apparently, M.M.Buhr went to the University of Manitoba (Dr.H.G.Friesen's alma mater, hence a reason for him to cover up) before going to the University of Guelph where she was guaranteed a position. All for research that was wrong. Positions for nothing!!!! Please note that during this time period the country held a Royal Commission into Reproductive Research (my field) and found that the researchers were SUBSTANDARD WITH MANY BAD PRACTISES; i.e., venereal diseases in with the sperm samples etc. etc. Bad practices period. And these are the people I had to deal with. Do you understand why they wouldn't want a scientist around who wouldn't lie nor accept bad standards. I have been blacklisted to cover up for bad scientists and bad government.

You also have to be introduced to Dr.Cal Stiller of Western University ( London Ontario ) who also wears many hats as a front for many pharmaceutical agencies promoting the Center of Excellence scheme. He also had former students at the University of Manitoba who controlled a major biology department, and they bought back drug patents from drug companies and used the university to develop these for i.e., cancer. Sounds good, but think about it, they look to see if they can get a 25 to 35 percent improvement in an old discovery while tying up a whole department on development, NOT research of new drugs. Not discovery. My point is I wrote, courier letter with follow up phone call, Dr.Stiller and explained the NEW cancer theories. NO RESPONSE. Allegation, my new research would DISCOUNT (difference from disprove) his former students, and discount the Center of Excellence scheme. Again, basis for black listing. Note all the interconnections so important to black listing.

Back to the University of Guelph , where they were desperate for money, and along comes Monsanto and Genetically Modified crops. Monsanto gives U of G approximately 30 million, which in turn the government of Canada turns around and spends promoting Monsanto GMOs in Asia . Now we have reached the bird flu and TAGGED FOR DEATH theory.

See the Green and Red Sections on emerging diseases and how Monsanto's genetically modified crops may have been responsible for the rise of the bird flu in Asia . Grain is used to feed birds. Is this proof? No. If you are black listed you can't do the research; but if it were to be proven, then Monsanto could be held liable for all the damage caused to the farmers and economy caused by the bird flu. Can't prove what you can't test. Like 911, you won't appreciate it until the planes kill people. Why not try and stop it now? Help me.

The 1919 flu epidemic killed many but where did it come from? Magic? Spontaneous generation? Only if you believe in witch craft. I propose environmental stress. Part of the VTT work. What is a mutagen? Mustard gas is a mutagen. Tons of mustard gas was released in WW1. And other nasty things happened to the environment never fully examined nor appreciated until now. Mutagens from the war caused the outbreak of the killer flu. Proposition not proof. Good science proposes a problem then sets out to experiment. I'm black listed and need your help to carry on, but note, I started this section saying that my work wasn't out dated but relevant to saving your life. Well, what do you think? Relevant.

Look at other flu out breaks in the forties and fifties. The Green Revolution and pesticide misuse: tons of mutagens and environmental stress. Neat relationship. Should be examined. But note more carefully, in light of mad cow, bird flu, GMO crops and animals, we (OURSELVES) are attacking our own food supplies. This is crazy. It is dangerous. See Mass Extinction section in the Green Zone and read about pollution and new diseases.

But TAGGED FOR DEATH? Before going on, please realize that I am condensing long complicated subjects in order to keep your interests. In this short form it is only an outline, not a complete picture. VTT keeps coming back to cancer and AIDS, both viruses compromise the immune system. Bird flu and the 1919 flu do the opposite, they over activate the immune system so the young and healthy die. Quite an environmental culling/control device for an over populated species wouldn't you say. Bird flu can't go deep in the human respiratory tract so some believe it will not have that wide of an effect. Others believe it will mutate to become dangerous. I am not sure it will, but I am looking farther down the road after it intermingles with the African population that has interacted with AIDS. In the Green Section I talk about a new species of man with a changed gene, and babies are born to mothers who had AIDS. In the Red Section you see a gene discussed, a gene that was SHARED by the Black Death (a bacteria) and AIDS (a virus). In each case, approximately, one third of the population was immune and survived the plagues. So you see approximately 70% are susceptible to this genetic marker. Diseases are not parasites etc. etc. they are regulators and controllers and fabricators of evolution. Although individuals die, populations change in response to disease commands. Hence, the bird flu under environmental stress factors is going to interact with this gene marker and approximately one third of the world's population will be immune. Knowing this we can prepare Please note I wrote, CEO McKinnel of Pfizer, and Merck and others, saying there is a new approach to vaccine development, please help me help your families. They didn't help me. Recently I emailed the Canadian P.M.Stephen Harper, and asked him if he was a bad father and was he going to protect his children and explained how Ontario's vaccine had badly failed I the past (see the accompanying section for email). May be some one listened, though they never called back, because over the weekend His Health minister (former Ontario Health Minister at the time of the vaccine trouble) gave a news conference saying antiviral drugs would be available to everyone who needs them. He also said we have some of the best researchers in Canada working on vaccines. These people I would like to test.

Please note I wrote Hoechst Celanese (owner of Connaught Labs which produces many vaccines in Canada ) in the early nineties and explained the VTT work. They said in WRITING that they don't do basic research in Canada . You can check the old research proposals on the website. What gives? I had previously dealt with P.M. Paul Martin, but now lets ask P.M. Steven Harper if he loves his kids and will do everything in his power to protect them. My claim has been against BAD scientists, and I asked Martin to put my claims to the test against my detractors, and two of the leading infectious disease researchers are Drs. Low and Plummer. They are only good if they are capable of telling the truth. And sometimes telling the truth must expose wrongdoing. To stand up for academic standards and scientific integrity. If these two guys can't tell the truth when there is no panic how can you trust them to save you during a crisis? Ask Drs. Low and Plummer to answer, publicly, the question; is research described in derogatory terms excellent, yes, or no? Is lying for money fraud?

Again, these are fair and relevant questions because if it comes down to a bad batch of vaccines (see Canadian history and the shipping of thalidomide and contaminated blood) will they do the right thing? This is a test. After all don't we have 911 emergency drills? Disaster tests? This is a real disaster test, and I think it is very fair. What do you think, after all the lives you save may be your loved ones?

SPECIFIC ILLUSTRATIONS

I would like to share two examples that illustrate exactly what I have been up against for years and why my claims that the researchers are not exactly as wonderful or good as some would have you believe. I wrote the Windsor Cancer Center explaining my research concepts and the support I had and if I could work there if I brought MY OWN RESEARCH FUNDING. Let me repeat that, I would bring my own money to help defeat cancer. My own funding to make cancer history. I also wrote the Federal cabinet minister who also came from Windsor . Do you know what they replied? They were sorry but they had already set their budget and had no room for me and wished me the best. They turned down money for cancer research. How many times has the Cancer Society contacted you asking for money saying they will make cancer history only if you help? How many little kids have turned their piggy banks over to the Cancer Society in a big TV promotion?

I am a cancer survivor, but I can't treat any one because it would be bad science to do so with out the proper testing etc. I am now watching a favorite niece (2006) have a relapse with her cancer. She had conventional treatment a few years ago (chemo and radiation), but now I fear she may die. I have been black listed by some very black-hearted people. What do you think?

The importance about the Windsor Cancer Center is the university of Windsor , and a virus researcher whom I wrote in the early nineties explaining VTT. This was important because she was going to dig up some graves of the 1919 flu epidemic preserved by perma frost. I asked her to take genetic samples because of the genetic component of the VTT work. Did she reply? No. She was too busy fighting it out with her co-workers who were trying to claim all the credit for the research. You would think she would have been sympathetic to my plight and shown concern for the new theory. Obviously, she did not. Her concerns seem to be elsewhere.

My point? My research regarding the flu pandemic has a long history. My theories stand the test of time. My detractors do not look good exposed to the light of day. In fact, they look like a rather bad bunch, don't you agree? I need help. I believe I can do a lot of good for cancer and AIDS research, plus the flu concerns. There is so much more to my research, but none of it can get done with out help. I desperately need help. The black listing has driven me to the edge of personal bankruptcy. What can you do? As an ordinary person you have a mortgage, children to raise and other serious concerns, but you can email people and ask them to read my website. You can help expose the corruption. And there are people out there who have money to clone their pussy cat, or give the Russian s millions of dollars to fly in space: you could ask them to read my website and perhaps give me the funding I asked of Merck/Pfizer so I could do the ground work on the research and prepare all the pathways I need to understand. Please understand, I reviewed all the reference material before starting any work at U of Waterloo, and from that I found all the flaws, who were lying and who was telling the truth. And in six months I was able to prove the entire biology department was working under false assumptions and present them with the correct answers. Unfortunately, they weren't interested in academic truths, but only in prestige and money. This time, dear public, the answers, the truthful answers are more important, they represent your lives. Do you care? If you do you will help.

Thank you.

Edward A.Greenhalgh

INTRODUCTION TO THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, LETTERS AND EMAIL MATERIALS SENT TO FORMER P.M., PAUL MARTIN, AND THE (THEN) OPPOSITION LEADERS: ABUSES OF SCIENCE BY RICH AND POLITICALLY CONNECTED BUSINESS PEOPLE LEADS TO CRIME AND CIVIL RIGHTS ABUSE

The new P.M. Stephen Harper was asked if he was a bad father regarding the flu pandemic. Much earlier, former P.M. Paul Martin was asked if he was a bad grandpa. Are they doing enough and are the people in the Ministry of Health honest enough to tell the people the truth. Read the material and see what you think.

subject:
flu pandemic and do you love your children, and ACCOUNTABILITY email correction pm harper corection

The whole point of courier delivered letters is to ensure their delivery so that no one can claim that they never received the material. To this end the material sent to Mr. Jack Layton, leader of the NDP, was acknowledged by his staff whom I received a notice of receipt on Feb.07/2006. You will see that former P.M.Paul Martin had several years of knowing and made no response. Indeed, I had a telephone conversation with a member of his staff who apologized explaining that they had been instructed not to respond to any of my material. I wonder who gave those instructions; perhaps it was the same person who considered that Parents would waste a government grant for their children's day care on popcorn and beer? What the public must be aware is that leaders (whether Canadian (Tainted Blood Scandal) or American (FEMA/Hurricane Katrina) or European (UK agricultural scientific policy spreading Mad Cow disease harming the beef industry)) must make informed wise decisions. They must be CONSCIOUSLY aware and use the resources TRUTHFULLY available to them to protect your lives. For anyone to use the excuse”I didn't know” is not only unacceptable, it could be criminal: you could die.

Scientific principle demands that a theory be put forward and tested. The University of Waterloo is NOT a scientific center because they had a very simple and easy test to measure and settle the dispute. They chose not, proving that they weren't GOOD scientists. The University of Waterloo also had the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as measurement of fairness and justice, but they chose not to use it because they (the Board of Governors) are bad people and bad citizens! The Charter GUARANTEES any Canadian of ability and merit the right to education and employment. The University of Waterloo, and its ELITIST President Douglas Wright decided they were above the law and the Canadian constitution. And any country that will strip away the rights of its citizens is prepared to allow other bad things to happen. Please read the material presented to the various politicians and be aware of its time frame as it may well surprise you.

Edward A. Greenhalgh 8 Feb. 06

I originally finished this section in February, it is now May 2006 and Prime Minister Stephen Harper won the election. I emailed his office 03 May 2006 and followed up with a telephone call a few days later to confirm its receipt. P.M. Harper has PROMISED the public a government of ACCOUNTABILITY with protection for whistleblowers. He has also set aside one billion dollars for the flu pandemic. In my email I asked him if he was a bad father and if he loved his kids. Read the enclosed /following email and decide what you think his response should be. If he makes a response I will post it. What would you do if you were Prime Minister? President Bush, whom I have previously emailed? In light of my research theory, VTT, dating back to the early 90s and noting flu pandemics then, it comments on the GENETIC Basis for the concept that people (like you) may be TAGGED for DEATH (see main text of revision for details) and how all of my research has been vindicated while the University of Waterloo has been discredited. Wouldn't you want to help the research save your kids if you were PM? President? Email them (PM Harper and Pres. Bush) for a response. Email your friends and ask them for their opinions. Read the following material in order of presentation, but be aware of who knew what when, and who did nothing. Thank you. Edward A. Greenhalgh 8 May 2006

  Click here to continue Article...